Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar‐clip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function

Identifieur interne : 007E61 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 007E60; suivant : 007E62

Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar‐clip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function

Auteurs : Frits Van Kampen [Pays-Bas] ; Marco Cune [Pays-Bas] ; Andries Van Der Bilt [Pays-Bas] ; Frits Bosman [Pays-Bas]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:05C215EF448F8F805254E54E8E6C3BC0CE1C09B9

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Abstract: It could be hypothesised that attachments, which provide more retention against vertical and horizontal dislodgement, will be associated with more favourable parameters of oral function. This in vivo study is designed to provide data regarding initial retention force, loss of retention force after 3 months of function and postinsertion maintenance and complications associated with the use of magnet, bar‐clip and ball attachments in mandibular overdenture treatment. Eighteen edentulous subjects received two permucosal implants in the inter‐foramina region of the mandible, a new denture and three successive suprastructure modalities (magnet‐, bar‐clip and ball attachments). The retention force of the attachments at baseline and after 3 months was measured in a standardised way. The amount and type of postinsertion maintenance that was related to the attachment were evaluated. No differences in retention force at baseline and after 3 months of loading were observed for all three attachment types. The mean retention forces of magnet attachments, bar‐clip attachments and ball attachments were 8.1, 31.3 and 29.7 N respectively. Functional maintenance complications related to the attachments were predominantly observed in 11/36 magnet attachments. Functional problems in the ball attachment group were relatively rare, easily manageable and seen in 4/36 attachments. The bar‐clip attachments exhibited no maintenance problems at all.

Url:
DOI: 10.1046/j.0905-7161.2003.00961.x


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar‐clip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Kampen, Frits" sort="Van Kampen, Frits" uniqKey="Van Kampen F" first="Frits" last="Van Kampen">Frits Van Kampen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cune, Marco" sort="Cune, Marco" uniqKey="Cune M" first="Marco" last="Cune">Marco Cune</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Der Bilt, Andries" sort="Van Der Bilt, Andries" uniqKey="Van Der Bilt A" first="Andries" last="Van Der Bilt">Andries Van Der Bilt</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bosman, Frits" sort="Bosman, Frits" uniqKey="Bosman F" first="Frits" last="Bosman">Frits Bosman</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:05C215EF448F8F805254E54E8E6C3BC0CE1C09B9</idno>
<date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1046/j.0905-7161.2003.00961.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/05C215EF448F8F805254E54E8E6C3BC0CE1C09B9/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000282</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000282</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000282</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003486</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">003486</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0905-7161:2003:Van Kampen F:retention:and:postinsertion</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">008095</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">007E61</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">007E61</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar‐clip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: an
<hi rend="italic">in vivo</hi>
comparison after 3 months of function</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Kampen, Frits" sort="Van Kampen, Frits" uniqKey="Van Kampen F" first="Frits" last="Van Kampen">Frits Van Kampen</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Centre, Utrecht University</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Utrecht</settlement>
<region nuts="2">Utrecht (province)</region>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université d'Utrecht</orgName>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Central Military Hospital, Clinic of Special Dental Care, Utrecht</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Utrecht</settlement>
<region nuts="2" type="province">Utrecht (province)</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cune, Marco" sort="Cune, Marco" uniqKey="Cune M" first="Marco" last="Cune">Marco Cune</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Centre, Utrecht University</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Utrecht</settlement>
<region nuts="2">Utrecht (province)</region>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université d'Utrecht</orgName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Der Bilt, Andries" sort="Van Der Bilt, Andries" uniqKey="Van Der Bilt A" first="Andries" last="Van Der Bilt">Andries Van Der Bilt</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Centre, Utrecht University</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Utrecht</settlement>
<region nuts="2">Utrecht (province)</region>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université d'Utrecht</orgName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bosman, Frits" sort="Bosman, Frits" uniqKey="Bosman F" first="Frits" last="Bosman">Frits Bosman</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, University Medical Centre, Utrecht University</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Utrecht</settlement>
<region nuts="2">Utrecht (province)</region>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université d'Utrecht</orgName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">14</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="720">720</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="726">726</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope>
<publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2003-12">2003-12</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Ataches</term>
<term>Ataches magne</term>
<term>Attachment</term>
<term>Attachment systems</term>
<term>Attachment type</term>
<term>Attachment types</term>
<term>Ball attachment</term>
<term>Ball attachment group</term>
<term>Ball attachments</term>
<term>Ball matrices</term>
<term>Barclip attachments</term>
<term>Baseline</term>
<term>Chin support</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Davis packer</term>
<term>Dental research</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture base</term>
<term>Dyna magnet</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Former cuspids</term>
<term>Friadent</term>
<term>Friedrichsfeld</term>
<term>Functional maintenance complications</term>
<term>Functional problems</term>
<term>Healing collars</term>
<term>Horizontal dislodgement</term>
<term>Hybrid prostheses</term>
<term>Impl</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant level</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implants research</term>
<term>Initial retention force</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>Kampen</term>
<term>Loading period</term>
<term>Magnet</term>
<term>Magnet attachment</term>
<term>Magnet attachments</term>
<term>Magnet keeper</term>
<term>Magnet keepers</term>
<term>Maintenance problems</term>
<term>Maintenance requirements</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular denture</term>
<term>Mandibular denture base</term>
<term>Mandibular implant overdentures</term>
<term>Mandibular overdenture therapy</term>
<term>Mandibular overdenture treatment</term>
<term>Mandibular overdentures</term>
<term>Master cast</term>
<term>Masticatory function</term>
<term>Matrix</term>
<term>Maxillofacial implants</term>
<term>Metal matrix</term>
<term>Metal tubes</term>
<term>More favourable parameters</term>
<term>More retention</term>
<term>Naert</term>
<term>Nobel biocare</term>
<term>Oral function</term>
<term>Oral impl</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Partial relining</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction</term>
<term>Postinsertion</term>
<term>Postinsertion maintenance</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Relation avec</term>
<term>Retention</term>
<term>Retention force</term>
<term>Retention loss</term>
<term>Shiny spots</term>
<term>Successive attachments</term>
<term>Surgical procedure</term>
<term>Tissue conditioner</term>
<term>Utrecht</term>
<term>Various attachment types</term>
<term>Various studies</term>
<term>Vertical dislodgement forces</term>
<term>Vertical force</term>
<term>Vivo comparison</term>
<term>Vivo measurements</term>
<term>Vivo study</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Ataches</term>
<term>Ataches magne</term>
<term>Attachment</term>
<term>Attachment systems</term>
<term>Attachment type</term>
<term>Attachment types</term>
<term>Ball attachment</term>
<term>Ball attachment group</term>
<term>Ball attachments</term>
<term>Ball matrices</term>
<term>Barclip attachments</term>
<term>Baseline</term>
<term>Chin support</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Davis packer</term>
<term>Dental research</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture base</term>
<term>Dyna magnet</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Former cuspids</term>
<term>Friadent</term>
<term>Friedrichsfeld</term>
<term>Functional maintenance complications</term>
<term>Functional problems</term>
<term>Healing collars</term>
<term>Horizontal dislodgement</term>
<term>Hybrid prostheses</term>
<term>Impl</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant level</term>
<term>Implant placement</term>
<term>Implants research</term>
<term>Initial retention force</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>Kampen</term>
<term>Loading period</term>
<term>Magnet</term>
<term>Magnet attachment</term>
<term>Magnet attachments</term>
<term>Magnet keeper</term>
<term>Magnet keepers</term>
<term>Maintenance problems</term>
<term>Maintenance requirements</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular denture</term>
<term>Mandibular denture base</term>
<term>Mandibular implant overdentures</term>
<term>Mandibular overdenture therapy</term>
<term>Mandibular overdenture treatment</term>
<term>Mandibular overdentures</term>
<term>Master cast</term>
<term>Masticatory function</term>
<term>Matrix</term>
<term>Maxillofacial implants</term>
<term>Metal matrix</term>
<term>Metal tubes</term>
<term>More favourable parameters</term>
<term>More retention</term>
<term>Naert</term>
<term>Nobel biocare</term>
<term>Oral function</term>
<term>Oral impl</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Partial relining</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction</term>
<term>Postinsertion</term>
<term>Postinsertion maintenance</term>
<term>Present study</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Relation avec</term>
<term>Retention</term>
<term>Retention force</term>
<term>Retention loss</term>
<term>Shiny spots</term>
<term>Successive attachments</term>
<term>Surgical procedure</term>
<term>Tissue conditioner</term>
<term>Utrecht</term>
<term>Various attachment types</term>
<term>Various studies</term>
<term>Vertical dislodgement forces</term>
<term>Vertical force</term>
<term>Vivo comparison</term>
<term>Vivo measurements</term>
<term>Vivo study</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Utrecht</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract">Abstract: It could be hypothesised that attachments, which provide more retention against vertical and horizontal dislodgement, will be associated with more favourable parameters of oral function. This in vivo study is designed to provide data regarding initial retention force, loss of retention force after 3 months of function and postinsertion maintenance and complications associated with the use of magnet, bar‐clip and ball attachments in mandibular overdenture treatment. Eighteen edentulous subjects received two permucosal implants in the inter‐foramina region of the mandible, a new denture and three successive suprastructure modalities (magnet‐, bar‐clip and ball attachments). The retention force of the attachments at baseline and after 3 months was measured in a standardised way. The amount and type of postinsertion maintenance that was related to the attachment were evaluated. No differences in retention force at baseline and after 3 months of loading were observed for all three attachment types. The mean retention forces of magnet attachments, bar‐clip attachments and ball attachments were 8.1, 31.3 and 29.7 N respectively. Functional maintenance complications related to the attachments were predominantly observed in 11/36 magnet attachments. Functional problems in the ball attachment group were relatively rare, easily manageable and seen in 4/36 attachments. The bar‐clip attachments exhibited no maintenance problems at all.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Pays-Bas</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Utrecht (province)</li>
</region>
<settlement>
<li>Utrecht</li>
</settlement>
<orgName>
<li>Université d'Utrecht</li>
</orgName>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="Pays-Bas">
<region name="Utrecht (province)">
<name sortKey="Van Kampen, Frits" sort="Van Kampen, Frits" uniqKey="Van Kampen F" first="Frits" last="Van Kampen">Frits Van Kampen</name>
</region>
<name sortKey="Bosman, Frits" sort="Bosman, Frits" uniqKey="Bosman F" first="Frits" last="Bosman">Frits Bosman</name>
<name sortKey="Cune, Marco" sort="Cune, Marco" uniqKey="Cune M" first="Marco" last="Cune">Marco Cune</name>
<name sortKey="Van Der Bilt, Andries" sort="Van Der Bilt, Andries" uniqKey="Van Der Bilt A" first="Andries" last="Van Der Bilt">Andries Van Der Bilt</name>
<name sortKey="Van Kampen, Frits" sort="Van Kampen, Frits" uniqKey="Van Kampen F" first="Frits" last="Van Kampen">Frits Van Kampen</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007E61 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 007E61 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:05C215EF448F8F805254E54E8E6C3BC0CE1C09B9
   |texte=   Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar‐clip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022